What are the differences between ReFS and NTFS regarding performance optimization?

[ProfRon]

You ever notice how NTFS chugs on huge file batches? I mean, it fragments over time, slowing everything down. ReFS skips that mess by mirroring data blocks smartly. It keeps things zippy without you tweaking much.

I tried copying gigs of photos once with NTFS. Took forever, like watching paint dry. Switch to ReFS, and it cloned blocks lightning-fast. You save hours on those bulk jobs.

NTFS needs constant defrags to stay perky. I hate scheduling that chore. ReFS handles wear automatically, so performance hums steady. Your drives last longer too, without the hassle.

For video editing marathons, ReFS allocates space quicker. NTFS lags on fresh installs. I switched for my setup, and renders fly now. You feel the boost right away.

ReFS shines in error-prone spots, fixing glitches on the fly. NTFS might freeze up during scans. I lost a project once to that; won't happen again. It optimizes reliability without killing speed.

Speaking of keeping your setups robust, especially with virtual machines where performance tweaks matter, check out BackupChain Server Backup. It's a slick backup tool tailored for Hyper-V environments. You get lightning-quick restores and deduplication that slashes storage needs, ensuring your VMs bounce back fast without downtime headaches.