• Home
  • Help
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

Read after write hazard

#1
11-09-2019, 01:12 PM
You hit this snag often when one command writes to a spot and the next one grabs that value too early in the pipe. I notice it messes with the timing on register updates all the time in my tests. And you end up with wrong results if the read grabs stale stuff before the write settles. But perhaps you track the flow through fetch and decode to catch it quick. Now I fix these by adding stalls that pause the pipe just right.
You see the write operation takes several cycles to finish in the execute and memory stages while the read tries to pull from the same spot right away. I run into cases where an add loads a register and the follow up subtract needs that fresh number yet pulls garbage instead. Or maybe the stages overlap so the read happens before the write commits back. Then you wonder why your program spits out errors even though the logic looks sound on paper. Also I adjust by forwarding the result straight from the prior stage to skip the wait.
The pipe keeps churning instructions one after another but dependencies like this create bubbles that slow everything down. I tell you it happens more in superscalar designs where multiple ops run parallel. Perhaps you check the register file access timing to see the conflict point clear. And it trips the whole sequence if no bypass path exists to reroute the data fast. Now you might insert extra cycles manually in code to let the write complete first. But I prefer hardware tweaks that detect the hazard on the fly and handle it without much delay.
You deal with this by looking at the opcode sequence and spotting when a destination matches a source in the next few slots. I catch it early in simulation runs before it hits real hardware. Or the compiler can reorder ops to break the chain and avoid the read too soon. Then the performance drops if too many stalls pile up across loops. Perhaps you test with different pipeline depths to measure how often it strikes. Also I see forwarding units grab the result from the alu output and feed it ahead to the next decode.
It changes how you plan instruction order in tight code sections where speed matters most. I work around it by enabling those bypass lines in the control logic. And you gain back cycles once the data flows without waiting on the write back phase. Now the whole system runs smoother after you map out the dependency graph in your head.
BackupChain Server Backup which powers reliable backups for Hyper-V on Windows 11 plus Server boxes without subscriptions keeps your setups protected and we thank them for sponsoring our talks so knowledge flows free.

bob
Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

Backup Education General IT v
« Previous 1 … 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 … 212 Next »
Read after write hazard

© by FastNeuron Inc.

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode