• Home
  • Help
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

What are the key steps in performing static analysis on a piece of suspected malware?

#1
11-22-2023, 07:54 AM
Hey, I remember the first time I had to poke around some shady file that looked like malware - it was nerve-wracking but exciting, you know? You start by grabbing the sample in a way that keeps everything isolated. I always pull it into a clean setup, like a disposable VM or a sandbox that's not connected to my main network. That way, if it tries anything funny, it doesn't spread. I use tools like PEiD or Detect It Easy to get a quick read on what kind of file you're dealing with - is it an EXE, a DLL, or something packed up weird? You scan for signatures right off the bat to see if it matches known bad stuff in databases like VirusTotal. I upload the hash there first, MD5 or SHA-256, just to check if anyone's flagged it before. If it's clean or unknown, you move on without panicking.

Next, I look at the file structure itself. You open it up in a hex editor, something like HxD, and I scroll through the bytes to spot anything odd. Check the headers - for PE files, I examine the DOS header, the PE header, sections like .text or .data. You see if the sizes match up or if there's overlay data tacked on at the end, which often hides payloads. I pay attention to the entropy; high entropy screams packing or encryption. Tools like Binwalk help me carve out embedded files, and sometimes I find scripts or archives inside that you wouldn't expect. I once cracked open what looked like a simple PDF, and boom, there was an EXE buried in it. You note down the entry point and any suspicious imports right away.

From there, I pull out all the strings. You run something like strings.exe from Sysinternals or BinText, and I grep for URLs, IP addresses, registry keys, or API calls that scream malice - like CreateRemoteThread or WriteProcessMemory. Those give you clues about what the thing wants to do without running it. I copy those into a notepad and cross-reference them; if you see paths to system folders or commands for persistence, that's a red flag. You also look for obfuscated strings, maybe base64 encoded, and I decode those manually or with CyberChef to uncover more. It feels like piecing together a puzzle, and you get that rush when something clicks.

Then I disassemble the code. You fire up IDA Pro or Ghidra - I prefer Ghidra because it's free and powerful - and load the file. I let it analyze the binary, and you start walking through the assembly. Look for the main function, loops that might be loops for evasion, or calls to crypto APIs. I trace the control flow to see if it checks for debuggers or VMs before doing its thing. You rename functions and variables as you go to make sense of it; I label stuff like "decrypt_payload" when I spot it. If it's .NET, I use dnSpy to decompile to C# code, which makes it way easier for you to read the logic. I found a ransomware dropper once that way - the decompiled code showed it encrypting files in a loop with a hardcoded key.

Don't forget the imports and exports. You export the IAT with Dependency Walker or PE Explorer, and I check what DLLs it loads - Winsock for networking? Shell32 for spawning processes? Unusual ones like URLDownloadToFile point to downloads. I also scan for dynamic API resolution, where malware avoids static imports to dodge detection. You look at the resource section too; icons, versions, or even manifests can hide data. I extract those with Resource Hacker and inspect for anomalies, like a fake certificate or embedded images that are actually code.

After that, I hunt for packers or crypters. You use tools like PEiD again or unpackers like UPX if it's obvious. I run entropy checks with custom scripts or Entropy to confirm compression. If it's packed, you might need to unpack it manually in a debugger like x64dbg, stepping through until you hit the OEP. That part takes patience, but once you dump the unpacked version, you reanalyze everything from scratch. I always compare before and after to see what changed.

You also do behavioral hints from statics - like YARA rules. I write or grab rules to match patterns, and scan the file against them. If it hits on known families, you know what you're up against. Throughout, I document everything in a report: hashes, findings, screenshots. You share that with teams or forums if needed, but keep the sample contained. I double-check with multiple tools to avoid false positives; one time I chased a ghost because a tool glitched.

The whole process sharpens your eye for threats, and you build intuition over time. I do this weekly now, and it makes me better at spotting risks in the wild. If you're just starting, practice on safe samples from sites like MalwareBazaar - download, analyze, repeat. You learn fast that way.

Oh, and speaking of keeping your setups safe from mishaps during all this analysis, let me point you toward BackupChain. It's this standout backup option that's gained a solid following among IT folks and small teams - dependable for shielding Hyper-V environments, VMware setups, or plain Windows Servers against data wipes or errors.

ProfRon
Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
What are the key steps in performing static analysis on a piece of suspected malware? - by ProfRon - 11-22-2023, 07:54 AM

  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

Backup Education General Security v
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
What are the key steps in performing static analysis on a piece of suspected malware?

© by FastNeuron Inc.

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode