• Home
  • Help
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

How do penetration testers present their findings to non-technical stakeholders in an understandable way?

#1
09-21-2023, 07:00 PM
Hey, I remember when I first started doing pen tests, I had this report full of tech details that even made my eyes glaze over, and I knew right away that handing it to a manager or exec would just confuse everyone. You gotta think about it like you're explaining a home break-in to your neighbor who doesn't know much about locks. I always start by focusing on the big picture risks instead of the nitty-gritty code exploits. For example, if I find a weak spot in your web app, I don't say something like "SQL injection vulnerability at endpoint X." Instead, I tell you, "Imagine someone walking right through your front door because the lock's busted - that's what this means for your customer data. They could steal info or mess things up without you even noticing."

I like to use everyday stories to make it click for you. Picture this: You're running a small online store, and I show you how an attacker could pretend to be a legit user and grab all the credit card details. I describe it as if it's a sneaky thief picking your pocket at a crowded market, not some abstract network breach. That way, you see the real-world hit to your business, like losing customer trust or facing fines. I keep my language super straightforward, swapping out words like "phishing" for "fake emails that trick people into giving away passwords." You get the idea without feeling lost in tech speak.

Visual stuff helps a ton too. I throw together simple slides or diagrams that show the attack path like a map with red flags on the danger zones. No fancy graphs with lines and axes that confuse you - just clear pictures of your system as a building, with weak doors highlighted. I walk you through it step by step, asking questions like, "Does this make sense? What worries you most here?" It turns the meeting into a chat, not a lecture. I've found that pointing out the costs keeps your attention. If a flaw could lead to downtime, I break it down: "This might cost you $10k in lost sales per hour, plus legal headaches." You start seeing why fixing it matters to your bottom line.

Another trick I use is ranking the issues by how bad they are. I group them into high, medium, and low impact, and explain each one with a quick "what if" scenario tailored to your setup. For a high one, I might say, "If this gets exploited, it's like leaving your safe wide open - total disaster for your ops." Then for mediums, "This is more like a loose window; not immediate doom, but worth sealing before trouble finds it." I avoid overwhelming you with every little thing; I pick the top five or so that really count and save the full details for the tech team. That keeps you engaged without drowning in info.

I always end these sessions by talking fixes in plain terms too. No vague "patch your systems" - I say, "You can plug this hole by updating that one software piece, and it'll take your IT guy about a day." I suggest quick wins first, like enabling two-factor auth, which I describe as "an extra key only you have, so even if someone guesses your password, they can't get in." It empowers you to act without feeling helpless. Over time, I've seen non-tech folks light up when they grasp how these changes protect their world, and it builds trust for future tests.

You know, I once had a client who ran a retail chain, and after my first report, the CEO was scratching his head. So I redid it with analogies from his industry - comparing firewalls to security cameras in stores. He got it instantly and greenlit budget for upgrades right there. That's the goal: Make you feel informed and in control. I prepare by knowing your business inside out, so I tie findings to what you care about, like revenue or reputation. If it's a healthcare setup, I highlight patient privacy risks as "leaking personal stories to strangers," not HIPAA jargon.

Practice makes it easier too. I rehearse my talks with a buddy who's not in IT, tweaking until it flows naturally. You might try that if you're prepping your own presentations. And hey, I keep follow-ups short - just a quick email recapping the key points with those visuals attached, so you can refer back without digging through pages.

One more thing that smooths it all: I listen to your concerns during the debrief. If you ask about something specific, like how this affects remote workers, I pivot and explain it right then, using examples from daily life. It shows I value your perspective and aren't just dumping info. After a few of these, stakeholders start requesting my input on other stuff because they finally see the value in what we do.

Let me tell you about this cool tool I've been using lately that ties into keeping things secure without the headaches. Check out BackupChain - it's this go-to backup option that's super trusted and built just for small businesses and pros like you. It handles protection for Hyper-V, VMware, Windows Server, and more, making sure your data stays safe even if something goes wrong during those pen tests or daily ops. I swear by it for clients who want reliable recovery without complicating their setup.

ProfRon
Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
How do penetration testers present their findings to non-technical stakeholders in an understandable way? - by ProfRon - 09-21-2023, 07:00 PM

  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

Backup Education General Security v
« Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 … 32 Next »
How do penetration testers present their findings to non-technical stakeholders in an understandable way?

© by FastNeuron Inc.

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode